Real power in orang asli village
In one village, my team and I came across this young boy, wearing a Real Madrid jersey.
K Kabilan has been a journalist for the past 13 years. He returned from a one-year sabbatical in 2006 to assume the post of an editor with an influential online daily in Malaysia. The opinions and comments posted here are his alone.
Makkal Osai had an interesting item in its front page today.
Anyways, I did some digging in the net and this is what I discovered, including a picture of her:
And what’s her origin like? There are two versions.
Don’t ask me how these turned her into being the protector of transsexuals.
And one final bid of information - her dedicated temple is located in Shankhalpoor (Gujrat in India ). This holy place is today known as Bahucharaji.
So there we go. All that you wanted to know about the holy guardian of the transgenders.
Somehow I am still loss for words.
Food and drinking water shortages.
Is this story for real? I smell rat, scam and fake in it. This is a story of a Japanese man who thinks plastic dolls are better than real girls.
Labels: world
I found this Reuters story from Germany really funny.
What a con job. We have all been fleeced all these years.
Just when you thought the Argentinians would actually convert their excellent display of matches into winning the Copa America hands down, they just do the direct opposite and lose lamely to an under-strength Brazil. (Brazil won 3-0 early this morning)
Labels: football
There was a bloody bloodshed in parliament today, all in the name of the prime minister and his new wife.
Labels: abdullah ahmad badawi, malaysia, politics
A Boeing 747 jumbo is just worth Rs1,600 (RM160)? But cycle is valued Rs91,000 (RM9,100)?
Two disturbing trends happened today which cause concern to me personally as a non-Muslim in this country.
There was a High Court ruling today which said that the former deputy prime minister was not defamed by his former boss who called him a "sodomiser".
The ruling, albeit without a full trial, stated that the term as used was justified and uttered in the interest of the public.
This defamation suit, to the amount of RM100 million, is the second such suit by the former deputy premier against the former premier.
The judge today pointed this out and said the words uttered were identical to the words complained of in the 1999 defamation action.
She then said the findings of the High Court in 1999 to dismiss the suit was applicable now as well.
But more damaging, she said that there was a judicial finding that the former deputy prime minister had indeed taken part in homosexual acts.
She was referring to the finding made by the High Court when the politician was convicted on the charge of sodomosing his former family driver. This conviction was upheld by the Court of Appeal and although a further appeal was allowed by the Federal Court by a majority decision.
But this part of the original ruling was never in dispute:
"... we find evidence to confirm that the appellants were involved in homosexual activities and we are more inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen, sometime..."
Now, my question is this.
With the standing High Court decision and the civil court ruling today, would it mean that we can use the alleged defamatory term against the former deputy premier without defaming him!
Of course, we shall await his appeal to the Court of Appeal against the defamation suit for better clarification.
European Union has put up a 44-second video online to promote films made in Europe.
Pratibha Patil is the ruling Congress-led government’s choice to be the next Indian president.
The situation in Zimbabwe is truly sad. The people there are suffering due to the economic mismanagement of President Robert Mugabe.